Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Eric Smith <eric <at> trueblade.com> writes:
Last I saw Antoine had written a script that might do what we want, but
hadn't been thoroughly tested. Now I've seen a few checkins for files
that have been run through the script.
As far as I'm concerned, it was a case of eating my own dog food: running the
script over a couple of files I'm interested in (_ssl.c, _fileio.c). I believe
Victor processed posixmodule.c for the same reasons.
What gives? And why do this so close to 2.7? I don't think it will cause
any problems, but it's hard to review commits to ensure they have no
changes when there's a rush of large commits near a release.
Well, however soon or late we do this, good luck reviewing multi-thousand line
commits to check no mistake sneaked in :)
That's my point. Since it's basically unreviewable, is it smart to do it
during a beta?
I grant you that it's a largely a mechanized change (except for the "a
posteriori manual intervention" part), but still.
Eric.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
