On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:43 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: > So please join us in considering the issue fixed unless you can provide > a really world example that demonstrates the contrary.
The server software I maintain (openrpg) experiences this issue with when I tried porting the server code to 3.2. Granted it was only a 5 to 7% speed drop over single core, though with the old GIL (py2.5) there was a 25% to 30% speed drop (It can be running upto 300 IO bound threads & 30 CPU bound threads) so a net improvement of 20% so I am more than happy with the new GIL. I think the new GIL should be given a year or so in the wild before you start trying to optimize theoretical issues you may run into. If in a year people come back and have some examples of where a proper scheduler would help improve speed on multi-core systems even more, then we can address the issue at that time. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com