Am 12.07.2010 13:01, schrieb Tal Einat: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:41 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: >>> My point is that I don't think I am exaggerating IDLE's flaws. I'm not >>> saying that it is no longer usable or useful, but I am saying that its >>> current state is not "okay". >> >> So can you produce a list of patches that you think can be accepted as-is? > > That's not a fair question! > > There have been several such patches, but most will likely need > revision since they have been sitting around untouched for so long. > And there would have been many more patches if the existing ones would > have been addressed. > > Getting a few current patches accepted is not the reason I posted here.
Ok. Then I guess I cannot help further - I certainly don't support removal of IDLE from the standard library. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
