On Jul 25, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Michael Foord wrote: > On 25/07/2010 19:34, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: >> [snip...] >>> On the other hand, posting actual patches that fix actual bugs can >>> make a lot of a difference. Also, having a maintainer who is willing >>> to look into these patches and accept the good ones will make a lot >>> of a difference. >>> >> With respect to the trace module, I started both of these things >> already, but I would really like to hear feedback from people >> interested in the future of pdb and profile modules as well. >> > > Antonio Cuni demoed some *great* improvements to the pdb module at > EuroPython. A project called pdb++ > > http://codespeak.net/svn/user/antocuni/hack/pdb.py > > Among its improvements it includes the ability to debug through generator > frames, which pdb can't. It would be great to see some of these fixes folded > back into the standard library version. >
+1 Raymond _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
