On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 21:51:11 -0400, "R. David Murray" <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote: > On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:59:52 +0200, georg.brandl <python-check...@python.org> > wrote: > > Author: georg.brandl > > Date: Mon Aug 2 20:59:52 2010 > > New Revision: 83543
Hmm. Looking at the format of this message as it came back to me, I can see that the change to the Reply-To for checkins breaks my email filtering. Previously I could catch replies to my checkins by looking for my committer id in the 'To' field, and I would put those in a special folder, and so I would see right away that I had a message. Now they just wind up in the general python-dev and python-checkins folders, which I do not necessarily read every day. So this change will actually slow down my noticing replies. I can't see any reliable identifying characteristic of the message which I could use to move it into the 'alert' folder. Checking the message body for 'r.david.murray <python-check...@python-org>' will work most of the time, if people's email clients follow the normal quoting conventions and the reply header is left in. But it isn't going to be 100% reliable. Would it be possible to include the committer id in the 'realname' field on the To address? (Or on the CC address). -- R. David Murray www.bitdance.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
