On 7 Aug, 2010, at 10:24, Hirokazu Yamamoto wrote: > This is the idea just popped up. :-) > > #define SIG(name) if (sig_num != SIG##name) > SIG(ABRT) SIG(FPE) SIG(ILL) SIG(INT) SIG(SEGV) SIG(TERM) { > PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError, "signal number out of range"); > return NULL; > } > #undef SIG
What's wrong with: switch (sig_num) { case SIGABRT: case SIGFPE: ... case SIGTERM: break; default: PyErr_SetString(...) return NULL; } That would IMO be clearer than the macro you propose. Ronald > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ronaldoussoren%40mac.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com