On 09/07/2010 11:40 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
Decimal may actually have this backwards. The idea would be that min(*lst) == sorted(lst)[0], and max(*lst) == sorted(lst)[-1].
Here you mean "is" rather than "==", right? The relations you spelled are guaranteed regardless of stability.
(This doesn't apply to Decimal.max and Decimal.min, which return new objects.)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
