Am 24.09.2010 23:22, schrieb Daniel Stutzbach: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:09 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de > <mailto:mar...@v.loewis.de>> wrote: > > I think it would be possible to have two versions of > _PyGC_REFS_UNTRACKED, one being, say, -5. > _PyGC_REFS_UNTRACKED_AND_KEEP_IT_THAT_WAY would be what you get > when you call PyObject_GC_UnTrack; the code to do automatic > tracking/untracking based on contents would use some other > new API (which would be non-public in 2.7.x). > > > Where would the extra state information be stored? (to distinguish > untracked and untracked-and-keep-it-that-way)
As everything else: in gc_refs. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com