On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:52:18 -0000 exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote: > > > >Regardless of the tool(s) used, code reviews are a fantastic > >equalizer. If you have long time, experienced developers "submitting" > >to the same rules that newer contributors have to follow then it helps > >remove the idea that there is special treatment occurring. > > Of course, this is only true if the core developers *do* submit to the > same rules. Is anyone proposing that current core committers have all > their work reviewed before it is accepted? > > (I am strongly in favor of this, but I don't think many core committers > are.)
While I agree with non-trivial patches being *posted* for review, I don't agree that an actual review should happen in order for a patch to be committed. That's unless we get 10x the number of reviewers we currently have. (and you certainly know by experience that I would be glad to have reviews on my patches, especially the network-related ones ;-)) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
