On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:31:24 +0200 Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net> wrote: > > This is probably sophistry, but if an issue is invalid, it doesn't need > a patch :)
Not only, but it generally gets closed too. > The first stage seems to be "unit test needed" anyway, which > sounds to me a bit like "needs to be checked for reproducibility/validity". I don't like this first stage, it makes it look like we mandate a proper unit test to proceed with actually writing patches, which is really not true. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
