Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 14:16 +0000, Michael Foord a écrit : > On 03/11/2010 14:05, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Raymond Hettinger > > <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sounds like a decision to split a module into a package is a big > >> commitment. Each of the individual file names becomes a permanent part of > >> the API. Even future additional splits are precluded because it might > >> break someones dotted import (i.e. not a single function can be moved > >> between those files -- once in unittest.utils, alway in unittest.utils). > > Can Python 2.7 pickles containing unittest classes be unpickled using > > 2.6 or earlier? Even if nobody uses the new names for imports, I > > believe they implicitly end up included in any pickles involving > > affected classes (I seem to recall we've been bitten by that before > > when moving things around). > > Yes, since unittest.TestCase is still available (as are all the names). > I believe so anyway...
unittest.TestCase is not really pickleable. There were test_multiprocessing issues because of that (see recent SVN checkins). Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
