On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Michael Foord <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk> wrote: > On 05/11/2010 17:10, geremy condra wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Laurens Van Houtven<l...@laurensvh.be> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Allan McRae<al...@archlinux.org> wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>> What is true is that there's a new and temporary "NO ARCH" rule in the >>> topic >> >> It's your channel and you can do with it what you want, > > Actually it's a PSF run channel. > >> but seriously- >> does this strike you as the best response to a widespread problem? >> You're basically telling people to get lost, and in all caps no less. >> > They're saying that the channel isn't the correct place to get support on > that particular issue.
In the same way that telling someone to RTFM n00b is the same thing as telling them to kindly refer to the documents produced by man, yes. As you said during the "python 2 or 3" discussion some months back "given the topic is far more nuanced than an IRC topic can express maybe that just isn't the right place for it". Geremy Condra _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
