On 11/06/2010 12:01 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 11/6/2010 11:42 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:38:22 +0100, Georg Brandl<g.bra...@gmx.net> wrote:
Am 06.11.2010 05:44, schrieb Ezio Melotti:
Hi,
On 05/11/2010 19.08, Python tracker wrote:
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010-10-29 - 2010-11-05)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the
issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open 2514 (+17)
This seems wrong. A default search for open issues returns 2452 and it
was about the same yesterday just a few hours after the report.
closed 19597 (+78)
total 22111 (+95)
as suggested in recent mails[0][1] I changed these values to represent
the deltas with the previous week.
Now let's try to keep the "open" delta negative ;)
Since there were more issues closed than opened I think it really was.
Anyway, we are down 300 from the 2750 peak.
Current status from the tracker...
don't care: 22134
not closed: 2491
not selected: 1
open: 2451
languishing: 25
pending: 39
closed: 19604
That gives us...
2451 open
1 not selected
39 pending
25 languishing
----
2516 Total open
2451 open
39 languishing
1 not selected
----
2491 total "not closed"
19604 closed
2491 not closed
39 pending
-----
22134 Total issues
My guess as to how this got this way, is that different fields were merged
at some time where the meanings didn't quite match up. <shrug>
It would be nicer if...
closed + not_closed = total issues
closed + open + not_selected = total issues
Pending and languishing should be keywords or sub categories of open.
Cheers,
Ron
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com