Am 17.11.2010 22:16, schrieb Éric Araujo: >> Excluding a builtin name from __all__ sounds like a perfectly sensible >> idea, so even if it wasn't deliberate, I'd say it qualifies as >> fortuitous :) > > But then, a tool that looks into __all__ to find for example what > objects to document will miss open. I’d put open in __all__.
So it comes down again to what we'd like __all__ to mean foremost: public API, or just a list for "import *"? Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
