On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Ron Adam <r...@ronadam.com> wrote: > Yes, it's realising that it is a *lot* more *complicated*, that gets me. > Flawed isn't the right word, it's rather a feeling things could have been > simpler if perhaps some things were done differently.
*That* feeling I can understand. The import system has steadily acquired features over time, with each addition constrained by backwards compatibility concerns with all the past additions, including the exotic hacks people were using to fake features that were added more cleanly later. For the directory-as-module-not-package idea, you could probably implement a PEP 302 importer/loader that did that (independent of the stdlib). It would have the advantage of avoiding a lot of the pickle compatibility problems that a "flat package" like the new unittest layout can cause. However, you would need to be very careful with it, since all the files would be sharing a common globals() namespace. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
