On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:08:43 -0800 > "Gregory P. Smith" <g...@krypto.org> wrote: > > Sleeping on the issue some more and pondering it... > > > > Is there any _good_ reason not to just make the close_fds default change > in > > 3.2 today? No warning (since they're never seen by most people anyways). > > Document it in Misc/NEWS and whatsnew.rst. > > Yes, it will break many scripts under Windows. > That's the core of the issue, really. I agree under Unix it makes > sense to change the default. > Sorry, yes, I was ignoring windows in the above statement. I only want the change in default on unix, windows has different needs. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/greg%40krypto.org >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
