On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:20:04 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me. > > If anyone complains too much, perhaps we can offer to retain the old > ConfigParser as "_BuggyConfigParser"? (that idea is only partially > tongue-in-cheek...) Or we can put it in the "buggy" module which receives all buggy code. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com