On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:20:04 +1000
Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 from me.
> 
> If anyone complains too much, perhaps we can offer to retain the old
> ConfigParser as "_BuggyConfigParser"? (that idea is only partially
> tongue-in-cheek...)

Or we can put it in the "buggy" module which receives all buggy code.

Regards

Antoine.


_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to