On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Mark Shannon <ma...@dcs.gla.ac.uk> wrote: > OK, so UnicodeError_xxx is important for codecs, but surely this sort of > argument could be made for lots of things. > Don't forget that for each function added to the API, > all other implementations have to support it forever.
Other implementations that want to support CPython extensions should focus their efforts on the limited API defined in PEP 384. That will not only be a lot easier, it will also be less of a moving target. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
