Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 13:56 -0600, Benjamin Peterson a écrit : > 2011/2/28 Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net>: > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:36:11 -0500 > > Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > >> > >> > + an existing branch. The pusher then has to merge the superfetatory > >> > heads > >> > >> 'superfetatory'? I have no idea of what this is, neither does > >> merriam-webster.com ;-). > > > > There are some Google hits, though... Not sure if they are of people > > making the same mistakes as I do ;) > > Endly, perhaps it will be adopted. Did you mean "superfluous" though?
I really meant superfetatory (it's slightly different: superfluous is simply useless, while superfetatory implies that it's in excess). _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
