On 06.03.2011 17:10, R. David Murray wrote: > On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 01:11:24 +1000, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: >> > On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 00:52:08 +1000 >> > Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> I'm actually OK with the status quo, but if we were going to change >> >> it, I would continue to leave (default) out. >> >> >> >> Completely unqualified =3D cpython default >> >> Only branch name =3D cpython branch >> >> Only repository name =3D other repository default >> >> repository name and branch name =3D other repository branch >> > >> > Well, I'm not sure, but the regularity of the "cpython" prefixes makes >> > it easier to distinguish cpython commits from non-cpython ones IMO. >> >> It's a mental pattern matching thing - word layout is noticed before >> word content. > > Um, yes, that's why having cpython in there makes it easier to recognize > cpython commits when scanning a list of subjects.
+1 for keeping "cpython". It's much shorter than "rXXXXX - in python/branches/py3k" anyway, so I don't see what's so bad about 7 helpful characters. Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com