On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:10:59 +0100
Michael Foord <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk> wrote:
> On 06/04/2011 15:26, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Glenn Linderman<v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com>
> > wrote:
> >> With more standardization of versions, should the version module be
> >> promoted
> >> to stdlib directly?
> > When Tarek lands "packaging" (i.e. what distutils2 becomes in the
> > Python 3.3 stdlib), the standardised version handling will come with
> > it.
> >
> >> On 4/5/2011 11:52 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >>
> >> DEFAULT_VERSION_RE = re.compile(r'(?P<version>\d+\.\d(?:\.\d+)?)')
> >>
> >> __version__ = pkgutil.get_distribution('elle').metadata['version']
> >>
>
> I really dislike this way of specifying the version. For a start it is
> really ugly.
Agreed, it is incredibly obscure and unpleasantly opaque.
Regards
Antoine.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
