On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:34:06 +0200, =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=89ric_Araujo?= <mer...@netwok.org> wrote: > > Perhaps we need a @python_implementation_detail skip decorator? > Thatâs called test.support.cpython_only (see also > test.support.check_impl_detail). Youâre welcome.
Nope. That's not what I was talking about. I was talking about marking a test as something that we require only the *python* implementation of a module to pass (presumably because it tests an internal implementation detail). Thus a C accelerator would not be expected to pass that test, nor would a C# accelerator, but pypy or any platform without an accelerator (that is, anything *using* the python code) would be expected to pass it. I would hope that such tests would be vanishingly rare (that is, that all needed tests can be expressed as black box tests). -- R. David Murray http://www.bitdance.com
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
