Glenn Linderman writes:
> I would not, however expect the original case that was described:
> >>> nan = float('nan')
> >>> nan == nan
> False
> >>> [nan] == [nan]
> True # also True in tuples, dicts, etc.
Are you saying you would expect that
>>> nan = float('nan')
>>> a = [1, ..., 499, nan, 501, ..., 999] # meta-ellipsis, not Ellipsis
>>> a == a
False
??
I wouldn't even expect
>>> a = [1, ..., 499, float('nan'), 501, ..., 999]
>>> b = [1, ..., 499, float('nan'), 501, ..., 999]
>>> a == b
False
but I guess I have to live with that.<wink> While I wouldn't apply it
to other people, I have to admit Raymond's aphorism applies to me (the
surprising thing is not the behavior of NaNs, but that I'm surprised
by anything that happens in the presence of NaNs!)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
