On Tue, 10 May 2011 08:36:38 +0300, Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> With an unlimited error message length it could make sense to say "Hey, I
> see 'x' may be assigned in this scope, so I mark it local. But this access
> to 'x' happens before assignment - so ERROR". This isn't realistic, of
> course, so I'm wondering:
> 
> 1. Does this error message (although unrealistic) capture all possible
> appearances of UnboundLocalError?
> 2. If the answer to (1) is yes - could it be usefully shortened to be
> clearer than the current "local variable referenced before assignment"?
> 
> This may not be possible, of course, but it doesn't harm trying :-)

How about:

"reference to variable 'y' precedes an assignment that makes it a local
variable"

IMO this still leaves room for confusion, but is better because it
indicates the causation more clearly.  (I don't think it is necessary to
capture the subtlety of conditional assignment in the error message.)

--
R. David Murray           http://www.bitdance.com
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to