Tom Whittock wrote:
Currently every time one of these objects is accessed from Python, a new "myproxy" instance is created. So if I were to access the same field of an object twice, I would receive two python objects proxying the same underlying C++ object.
Perhaps you could use a WeakValueDictionary to keep a mapping from a C++ object address to its Python proxy. Then as long as a proxy object is alive, accessing the same C++ object again will get you the same proxy object. When there are no longer any references to the proxy object from Python, it will go away. The next time you access that C++ object you'll get a new proxy, but that won't matter, because the original proxy is no longer around to compare it with. This depends on there being some way for the proxy object to ensure that the C++ object remains alive as long as it does. It also won't solve the problem of keeping the id of the proxy for longer than the proxy exists, but that's probably not something you should be relying on anyway. The id of *any* Python object is only valid while the object lives, and if it's still alive you have a real reference somewhere that you can use instead of the id for identity testing. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
