On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:21:30 +0100 Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Two questions: > 1. What level of support is there for PEP 397? If it's unlikely to get > accepted, there's little point in basing a solution on it.
It only needs support from our Windows users or developers. It is doubtful than any Linux or OS X user would oppose it on purely platonic grounds. I myself, as a casual Windows user, understand that the current situation is not optimal and believe that any improvement is welcome. Practically, if Mark Hammond is satisfied with his own proposal, if Martin doesn't oppose it, and if other users like you say it's a good step forward, then I don't see any reason for it *not* to be accepted. (if you want an explicit +1, here it is :-)) > 2. Would it be worth extending the goals of the PEP to make > simplifying command line usage an explicit goal? Or is it better to > keep PEP 397 focused on one thing and have a separate PEP covering > such further extensions to the PEP 397 launcher? I have no opinion about that. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
