On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> wrote: > 2011/7/29 Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net>: >> Shouldn't there be a matching Doc change somewhere? > > Somewhere is the question!
While None/NotImplemented/Ellipsis are all documented as singletons, the behaviour of calling their types is not specified anywhere. If this was to be detailed anywhere, then the sections on None/NotImplemented/Ellipsis in section 3.2 of the language reference would be the place. And on that note... was there any particular reason for leaving NotImplemented out for this change? Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
