On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote: > Maciej Fijalkowski, 02.09.2011 20:42: >>> >>> For a comparative real world benchmark I tested Martin von Loewis' >>> django port (there are not that many meaningful Python 3 real world >>> benchmarks) and got a speedup of 1.3 (without IIS). This is reasonably >>> well, US got a speedup of 1.35 on this benchmark. I just checked that >>> pypy-c-latest on 64 bit reports 1.5 (the pypy-c-jit-latest figures >>> seem to be not working currently or *really* fast...), but I cannot >>> tell directly how that relates to speedups (it just says "less is >>> better" and I did not quickly find an explanation). >> >> PyPy is ~12x faster on the django benchmark FYI > > FYI, there's a recent thread up on the pypy ML where someone is complaining > about PyPy being substantially slower than CPython when running Django on > top of SQLite. Also note that PyPy doesn't implement Py3 yet, so the > benchmark results are not comparable anyway.
Yes, sqlite is slow. It's also much faster in trunk than in 1.6 and there is an open ticket about it :) The "django" benchmark is just templating, so it does not involve a database. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
