On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:26:27 +1100
> Andrew Bennetts <and...@bemusement.org> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think that's news either.
>> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-May/035907.html and
>> http://twistedmatrix.com/pipermail/twisted-python/2003-June/004339.html for
>> instance show that in 2003 it was clearly known to at least be likely to be 
>> an
>> exploitable DoS in common code (a dict of HTTP headers or HTTP form keys).
>>
>> There was debate about whether it's the language's responsibility to mitigate
>> the problem or if apps should use safer designs for handling untrusted input
>> (e.g. limit the number of keys input is allowed to create, or use something
>> other than dicts), and debate about just how practical an effective exploit
>> would be.  But I think it was understood to be a real concern 8 years ago, so
>> not exactly sudden.
>
> That's not news indeed, but that doesn't make it less of a problem,
> especially now that the issue has been widely publicized through a
> conference and announcements on several widely-read Web sites.
>
> That said, only doing the security fix in 3.3 would have the nice side
> effect of pushing people towards Python 3, so perhaps I'm for it after
> all.
>
> Half-jokingly,
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: 
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fijall%40gmail.com

Just to make things clear - stdlib itself has 1/64 of tests relying on
dict order. Changing dict order in *older* pythons will break
everyone's tests and some peoples code. Making this new 2.6.x release
would mean that people using new python 2.6 would have to upgrade an
unspecified amount of their python packages, that does not sound very
cool. Also consider that new 2.6.x would go as a security fix to old
ubuntu, but all other packages won't, because they'll not contain
security fixes. Just so you know

Cheers,
fijal
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to