If this can encourage more projects to support Python 3 (even if it's only 3.3 and later) and hence improve adoption of Python 3, I'm all for it.
A small quibble: I'd like to see a benchmark of a 'u' function implemented in C. --Guido On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Armin Ronacher <armin.ronac...@active-4.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I just uploaded PEP 414 which proposes am optional 'u' prefix for string > literals for Python 3. > > You can read the PEP online: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0414/ > > This is a followup to the discussion about this topic here on the > mailinglist and on twitter/IRC over the last few weeks. > > > Regards, > Armin > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com