Le 28/02/2012 13:48, Giampaolo Rodolà a écrit : > Il 28 febbraio 2012 13:19, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> ha scritto: >> IMO, maintaining two branches shouldn't be much more work than >> maintaining hacks so that a single codebase works with two different >> programming languages. > > Would that mean distributing 2 separate tarballs? > How would tools such as easy_install and pip work in respect of that? > Is there a naming convention they can rely on?
Sadly, PyPI and the packaging tools don’t play nice with non-single-codebase projects, so you have to use a different name for your 3.x-compatible release, like “unittestpy3k”. Some bdists include the Python version in the file name, but sdists don’t. Regards _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
