On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote: >> I keep failing to see the interest in making this an error in the first > place. Why would the object that bf_getbuffer() is being called on have to > be identical with the one that exports the buffer?
OK, I misunderstood your suggestion. So you actually want to just remove the assert altogether, thus allowing delegation of the buffer API by defining *only* the getbuffer slot and setting obj to point to a different object? I don't see any obvious problems with that, either. It would need new test cases and some documentation updates, though. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
