On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Mark Shannon <m...@hotpy.org> wrote: > First of all, the semantics described in the PEP do not match the tests. > If you substitute the supposedly semantically equivalent code > based on normal yields for each yield from in the test code > (Lib/test/test_pep380.py) and run it, then it fails.
What's more important is whether or not it matches the semantics of inlining the subgenerator bodies. The expansion in the PEP was an attempt to define a way to achieve that in current Python without interpreter support. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
