On Mar 12, 2012, at 07:33 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: >It came up at the sprints about how to choose new PEP numbers. It was >agreed that the newest, *lowest* number should be used (e.g. 418) and not >the next highest number (e.g. 3156). I have already updated PEP 1 to >reflect this.
+1 -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
