Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:25:20 -0700
Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
Georg Brandl wrote:
On 25.03.2012 21:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Georg Brandl wrote:
Thanks everyone for the overwhelmingly positive feedback. I've committed the
new design to 3.2 and 3.3 for now, and it will be live for the 3.3 docs
momentarily (3.2 isn't rebuilt at the moment until 3.2.3 final goes out).
I'll transplant to 2.7 too, probably after the final release of 2.7.3.
I think it would be better to leave 2.7 with the old theme, to keep it
visually distinct from the nifty new theme used with the nifty new 3.2 and 3.3
versions.
Hmm, -0 here. I'd like more opinions on this from other devs.
+1 on keeping the 2.x and 3.x styles separate.
I don't really understand the point. If we want to distinguish between
2.x and 3.x, perhaps a lighter difference would suffice.
The point being that 2.x is finished, and the bulk of our effort is now
on 3.x. By not changing the 2.x docs we are emphasizing that 3.x is the
way to go.
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
