I'm personally +1 for pytz only — dateutil is big enough and... Well, can we just point to pytz in our docs for datetime module?
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > +1 If pytz is py3k cabable. -1 for dateutIl. > > > On Wednesday, March 28, 2012, Andrew Svetlov wrote: >> >> I figured out what pytz and dateutil are not mentioned in python docs >> for datetime module. >> It's clean why these libs is not a part of Python Libraries — but >> that's not clean for Docs. >> From my perspective at least pytz (as py3k compatible) should to be >> mentioned as the library which contains timezone info, supported >> carefully and recommended to use with datetime standard module, >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Andrew Svetlov >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> Python-Dev@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> Unsubscribe: >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -- Thanks, Andrew Svetlov _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
