On 29.04.2012 03:04, victor.stinner wrote: > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bd195749c0a2 > changeset: 76599:bd195749c0a2 > user: Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> > date: Sun Apr 29 03:01:20 2012 +0200 > summary: > Issue #14428: Use the new time.perf_counter() and time.process_time() > functions
[...] > diff --git a/Lib/timeit.py b/Lib/timeit.py > --- a/Lib/timeit.py > +++ b/Lib/timeit.py > @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ > -n/--number N: how many times to execute 'statement' (default: see below) > -r/--repeat N: how many times to repeat the timer (default 3) > -s/--setup S: statement to be executed once initially (default 'pass') > - -t/--time: use time.time() (default on Unix) > - -c/--clock: use time.clock() (default on Windows) > + -t/--time: use time.time() > + -c/--clock: use time.clock() Does it make sense to keep the options this way? IMO the distinction should be to use either perf_counter() or process_time(), and the options could implement this (-t -> perf_counter, -c -> process_time). Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com