Senthil, if you can shepherd this patch to completion that would be great! On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Senthil Kumaran <sent...@uthcode.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09:02PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one >> of >> the pdb add-ons or borging the best of their bits into the stdlib? > > Irrespective of this - Issue13183 seems to be an easy to verify bug in > 3.2 and 3.3. I think, it would most visible if you were to use a full > screen debugger and you will notice that the return call indicator has > jumped to the next statement (skipping return) when returning. I > guess, that's why Xavier (pyclewn author) noted it. The fix seems > fine too. > > I have just requested an additional info and this particular one could > be fixed. > > Thanks, > Senthil > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
