On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote: > Finally, I appreciate the feedback, but... why post it to python-dev? You > could have sent me private email, or posted to the issue (#14127), the > latter of which would have enabled using rich chocolaty Rietveld. I've seen > a bunch of comments on checkins posted here and it all leaves me scratching > my head.
It's just the way post-checkin review is set up - the "Follow-up-to" header for the python-checkins mailing list is python-dev. Such comments are rare enough and the fact that they apply to already committed code is important enough that there hasn't been a major push to get the scheme changed to anything else (by contrast, the old process where comments went back to python-checkins *was* problematic, as they would get lost in the flow of actual checkin messages, hence the switch to the current system). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
