On May 31, 2012 1:31 AM, "Guido van Rossum" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Agreed this could go on the tracker, but I don't see the need for a Python-Ideas detour.
+1 > It seems worth fixing (and I vaguely recall there was some follow-up last time?). You may be thinking of the abstract property fixes that went in - I'm fairly sure this specific problem report fell through the cracks. Cheers, Nick. -- Sent from my phone, thus the relative brevity :)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
