On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:20:58AM +0300, Eli Bendersky wrote: > Still, instance of type()" is a bit too cryptic for mere mortals, IMHO.
I think that if somebody finds "instance of type" too cryptic, they won't have any chance at all to understand metaclasses. Personally, I think there is a lot confusing about metaclasses, but the idea that classes are instances (objects) is not one of them. -- Steven _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
