On 29 September 2012 07:50, Tim Delaney <timothy.c.dela...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29 September 2012 06:51, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Wow! I had no idea cdecimal was that close in speed to float. That's >> seriously impressive. >> > > If those numbers are similar in other benchmarks, would it be accurate > and/or reasonable to include a statement along the lines of: > > "comparable to float performance - usually no more than 3x for > calculations within the range of numbers covered by float" > > or is there not enough evidence to conclude that? > > Substitute suitable factor for 3x. > > Obviously > And I meant to say congratulations - that's a really impressive result. Oh-oh. The PSU (which does not exist) has found me. I must hi Tim Delaney
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
