Mark Adam writes: > Easy: dict should have a (user substitutable) collision function that > is called in these cases.
"I smell overengineering." > This would allow significant functionality with practically no > cost. We already have that functionality if we want it; just define an appropriate mapping class. I don't need or want it, so I can ignore it, but I suspect to get anywhere with this proposal you're going to need to show that this "significant functionality" needs to be in syntax. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
