On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:56:22 +0200, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04.01.13 18:51, R. David Murray wrote: > > (To automate such monitoring we would need some sort of 'commit ready' > > flag in the tracker and a protocol for when it gets set...which might > > not be a bad idea, but would need to be discussed....) > > Is not "commit review" stage purposed for this?
Not currently. But we could potentially re-purpose it for that. Currently it is supposed to mean that we are in an RC stage, one committer has signed off on the patch, and we need a second signoff before committing. I don't think we actually work that way any more now that we have switched to hg. Instead what we have been doing is committing as per normal, and then the release manager's decision on whether or not merge the fix into his release clone takes the place of the second review. --David _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
