> How would that sit with the current proposal? I maintain a wrapper, > python-gnupg, > which communicates with the GnuPG process through subprocess. Although there > is > no in-built use of these parameters, users are allowed to pass additional > parameters to GnuPG, and they might use these esoteric GnuPG options.
Since you use subprocess, file descriptor passing to gnupg doesn't work since Subproces.Popen changed close_fds default to True (in 3.2) (which was the right decision, IMO). _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
