On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:33 PM, MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: > On 2013-02-13 13:23, Lennart Regebro wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> I prefer "x = '%s%s%s%s' % (a, b, c, d)" when string's number is more >>> than 3 >>> and some of them are literal strings. >> >> >> This has the benefit of being slow both on CPython and PyPy. Although >> using .format() is even slower. :-) >> > How about adding a class method for catenation: > > str.cat(a, b, c, d) > str.cat([a, b, c, d]) # Equivalent to "".join([a, b, c, d]) > > Each argument could be a string or a list of strings. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fijall%40gmail.com
I actually wonder. There seems to be the consensus to avoid += (to some extent). Can someone commit the change to urrllib then? I'm talking about reverting http://bugs.python.org/issue1285086 specifically _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
