On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > As Daniel pointed out, easy_install and pip also don't follow this rule yet, > so it won't really have any impact if we never get to metadata 3.0.
Actually, my point was that using a separate filename for version 2.0 would allow provision of both 1.x and 2.0, so version 2.0 metadata can be deployed as tool support becomes available, instead of having to wait until 1.x tools are replaced. Once tools are following the new rule about version compatibility, there's less worry about this (at least on my part). -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fred at fdrake.net> "A storm broke loose in my mind." --Albert Einstein _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
