Le Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:36:09 +0100, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> a écrit : > > I think Marc-André is right that the acceptability of the standard > should be judged on the availability of (preferably standard) > implementations. If the standard isn't implemented, then perhaps it > means it's too ambitious / too complex / victim of the second-system > effect. > > So I kind of agree with him the PEP shouldn't be accepted until > there's a decent patch pending for the stdlib. That's not a judgement > on the PEP's quality. Just an advice to remain cautious, especially > if the previous metadata version already enjoys a very poor adoption > rate. > > By the way, pip may be nice, but it's still a third-party tool, and > perhaps not even as widespread as distribute / setuptools.
Well, Nick kind of proved my wrong in his reply to Marc-André :-) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
