On Feb 27, 2013, at 3:20 PM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> * security by obscurity in legal position of PSF towards contributors
> https://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html
> vs
> http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ +
> http://www.samurajdata.se/opensource/mirror/licenses/afl-2.1.php
> or
> http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ +
> http://opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php
> and why PSF doesn't comply the 4. Redistribution clause from Apache 2.0
> license
>
I'm not even touching your security through obscurity trollbait, but I'd like
to know how the PSF / Python core is non compliant with clause 4, and the legal
counsel you spoke to to confirm this.
Jesse
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
