On 5 March 2013 13:21, Michael Foord <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk> wrote: >
> We can certainly talk about it - although as Guido says, something specific > may be easier to have a useful discussion about. > > Reading through your blog articles it seemed like a whole lot of subunit > context was required to understand the specific > proposal you're making for the TestResult. It also *seems* like you're > redesigning the TestResult for a single use case > (distributed testing) with an api that looks quite "odd" for anything that > isn't that use case. I'd rather see how we can > make the TestResult play *better* with those requirements. That discussion > probably belongs in another thread - or at > the summit. Right - all I wanted was to flag that you and I and any other interested parties should discuss this at the summit :). -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Cloud Services _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
